In terms of complexity and possible complications for the subsequent stages of medical device registration, the issue of trademarks (TMs) is the main one when drawing up the schedule of a medical device registration project.
Let us go back to the roots. There is an official position of Roszdravnadzor on this issue on its website: https://www.roszdravnadzor.gov.ru/about/faq/101 (in Russian)
01. The name of the medical device must match in the registration certificate and the registration dossier
(i.e., all documents, including labeling)
02. To add a trademark to the name, it is necessary
to go through the amendment procedure, submitting documents confirming the registration of the trademark

01. The exclusive right to a trademark
is certified by a trademark certificate
02. The exclusive right to an invention, utility model, and industrial design
is certified by a patent for an invention, utility model, and industrial design, respectively
03. The right to use a TM, utility model, or industrial design may be granted on the basis of a license agreement or a commercial concession agreement, and these are subject to mandatory state registration with Rospatent.
04. What is subject to state registration with Rospatent is not the license agreement or the commercial concession agreement,
but the grant of the right to use itself
The last paragraph of the letter raises the most questions among registrars.
The grant of the right to use is registered with Rospatent and is displayed in the register.
Example:

A transfer of rights has a term of validity, so it is important to renew the transfer of the right in time
01. Cancellation of the registration certificate upon a court decision on violation of rights under clause 57 of Government Decree No. 1416:
The registering authority decides to cancel the state registration of a medical device in the following cases:
02. Criminal and administrative liability
Questions:
Sometimes manufacturers do not suspect that means of individualization require registration as a trademark
This option is less likely, since the Manufacturer will need to produce a parallel medical device with a new set of labeling.
After choosing one option or the other, the authorized representative may face the task of filing an application with FIPS for registration of the TM in the territory of the RF.
To pass the stage of evaluating the documentation during state registration of a medical device
at Roszdravnadzor, it is enough to submit:
Roszdravnadzor is aware that the registration of a TM, like the registration of a medical device, takes a long time,
so it is not required to wait for the registration of the TM in order to begin the procedure for registering the medical device.
It is important to confirm that the applicant has initiated the registration of the TM.

However, the Roszdravnadzor website clearly states that, where a registration certificate already exists and a TM needs to be added to the name of the medical device,
it is required to submit documents confirming the registration of the TM, i.e., it is necessary to wait for the registration of the TM.
After the trademark certificate is obtained, it is recommended to attach it to the registration dossier (for example, together with the documents on the results of clinical studies).
If the manufacturer plans to use the Madrid system for TM registration,
the proof of TM registration will be a screenshot from the WIPO register, WITH THE RF OR THE EAEU COUNTRIES (when registering under EAEU rules) MANDATORILY INDICATED as the country of TM registration
accompanied by a letter from the Right Holder stating that the attached screenshot is correct,
duly certified.



The Manufacturer and the Right Holder may be different companies. In that case, the following options are possible when preparing the documents on TM registration:
1. The TM Right Holder is one company, and the Manufacturer is another, and both companies belong to a single group of companies, being subsidiaries of some third company.
Interestingly, if such a letter is issued, the grant of the right of use
need not be registered with Rospatent.
🛈 At the same time, in practice many simply resort to issuing letters of consent to the use of a trademark, thereby bypassing the need for registration with Rospatent.
Such letters of consent are, rather, a confirmation on the part of the right holder
that it has no claims regarding the use of the trademark,
If the parties so wish, where they have not concluded a license agreement but have simply issued a letter of consent:
The grant of the right of use of an international trademark at WIPO is not subject to registration at all.
Even in the absence of such registration of the grant of the right of use of the trademark with Rospatent, these unilateral letters of consent, with the required degree of legalization, must be submitted to Roszdravnadzor together with the confirmation of TM registration attached.
2. The TM Right Holder is one company, and the Manufacturer is another,
and they are separate legal entities.
Thus, a copy of the license agreement and the application to FIPS
(or the attached confirmation of TM registration) will have to be submitted to Roszdravnadzor.
The same plan of action must be followed in the case where the TM is already registered in the RF.
🛈 As a result, already at the stage of preparing the dossier documents, many problems can be eliminated
with the absence of TM registration or in the case of a complex chain of transfer of rights.
According to Article 1485 of the Civil Code
1. The TM sign confirms that the application has been filed,
but not that the TM has been registered.
2. This means that, after successful registration of the TM,
it is necessary to go through the amendment procedure to remove or replace the TM sign with the R or ® sign.
3. For this reason, it is not recommended to use the TM sign in the procedure for registering a medical device.
since this would entail additional costs and actions in the form of making amendments to the registration dossier.
Issues of protecting intellectual property and issues of the circulation of medical devices are interrelated.
🛈 Only the right approach can protect the applicant from additional unnecessary,
and often costly, actions.
Authors of the article: Alina Mustafina, Dmitry Likhaev